Christmas lights on London's Regent Street
The number “eight” usually means good fortune and luck in Chinese culture. But reflecting on the events of 2008, many people are doubting the good omen the number brings.
China has experienced a turbulent year, from snow storms, floods, earthquakes, milk powder contamination to recent business collapses due to global economic downturn.
The success of the 2008 Olympics and the election of Barack Obama have stood out to be the few inspiring and encouraging events of the year.
Globally speaking, 2008 has turned out to be a year of gloom and doom. It was exemplified by the global impact brought around by the Wall Street financial crisis, and the latest Middle East bloodshed which has left nearly 400 Palestinians dead.
Failing businesses and confidence have spoiled the year-end festival mood in the West, especially in the UK.
Economic recession in Britain is biting its retailers so hard that they are collapsing at a speed nearly as fast as the falling of a decommissioned building after the explosive is detonated.
Latest big British retail brands which have been affected by the downturn include children’s wear retailer Adams and music, DVD and games seller Zavvi.
Zavvi became the 3rd victim within 48 hours following the fall of menswear retailer The Officers Club and tea and coffee specialist Whittard last week.
Some 350 British retail companies have reportedly folded during the 3rd quarter of 2008, according to a UK insolvency service. The figure is 39% higher than a year ago. And 15 more big British relaters are predicted to meet the same fate by mid January.
Zavvi's demise is a domino effect of the closedown of the general store Woolworths, a subsidiary of which was supplying Zavvi.
Woolworths was due to celebrate its 100th birthday next year, but the ill-fated company has failed to survive the downturn and will be consigned to history by January 5.
Woolworths is clearing out all its high street stores across the UK. Its store window notice announcing "last five days" reflects well the declining British economy and creates a psychological blow to anyone passing by.
Losing in competition to online retailers and supermarkets is one reason why many high street sales are plunging. The loss of sales is why some of them have been forced into administration.
Offering Christmas sales had become the only option left for UK high street retailers to make the last-ditch profits of the year. If retailers fail to make money during the Christmas, there is a slim chance they will make it through the upcoming year.
For those who are in secure employment such as teachers and doctors, this Christmas offers a unique chance for them to enjoy a shopping spree. However, it has turned out to be the most depressing Christmas for those who have lost their jobs or are feeling uncertain about their future.
This misery was touched upon by Queen Elizabeth II as she started her annual Christmas speech. "Christmas is a time for celebration, but this year it is a more sombre occasion for many," she said.
Many people are enjoying shopping in the West End of London. For some, it is also a nice day out to feel the festival atmosphere. "I made a trip a few days ago to London, I have to say the Christmas lights on Regent Street this year are not as good as before, also only high-end stores were well decorated," said a resident from the outskirts of London.
The media in the UK does not help the gloomy situation at all. Job cuts and failing businesses are breaking the news and making the headlines nearly every day, painting a bleaker picture and sinking consumer's confidence to an all-time low.
British people have been warned of an economic slump deeper than expected. As a result, thousands of people have lost their jobs; an average 1,600 people will become jobless every day in 2009; house prices are predicted to fall 10 percent in 2009; more people are expected to claim social benefits. Even animal sanctuaries in the country have been inundated with dogs and cats as their owners discard them due to financial difficulties.
Church leaders in the UK have attempted to lift people's spirit during these dark times. Some have urged people not to base their happiness upon materialistic gains and try to see the light of hope at the end of the tunnel.
But their religious epithets will do little to comfort those with bills to pay.
Copyright Dongying Wang,
1 comment:
Church leaders in the UK have attempted to lift people's spirit during these dark times.
Some have urged people not to base their happiness upon materialistic gains and try to see the light of hope at the end of the tunnel.
But their religious epithets will do little to comfort those with bills to pay.
Hi Dongying I hope you had a Great Christian Christmas and you and your loved ones will happy Chinese New Year.
Dont fret about religious epithets, they never did anybody any real good.
Instead you need to focus your eyes upon the man himself -Jesus Christ.
Jesus was making shocking and startling statements about Himself.
He began to identify Himself as far more than a remarkable teacher or prophet.
He began to say clearly that He was God.
He made His identity the focal point of His teaching.
The all-important question He put to those who followed Him was, "Who do you say I am?" When Peter answered and said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:15-16), Jesus was not shocked, nor did He rebuke Peter.
On the contrary, He commended him!
He made the claim explicitly, and His hearers got the full impact of His words.
We are told, "The Jewish leaders tried all the harder to kill Him; not only was He breaking the Sabbath, but He was even calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God" (John 5:18).
On another occasion he said, "I and My Father are One." Immediately the Jewish leaders wanted to stone Him.
He asked them for which good work they wanted to kill Him.
They replied, "We are not stoning You for any of these but for blasphemy, because You, a mere man, claim to be God" (John 10:33).
Jesus clearly claimed attributes which only God has. When a paralyzed man was let down through the roof wanting to be healed by Him, He said, "Son, your sins are forgiven you."
This caused a great to-do among the religious leaders, who said in their hearts, "Why does this fellow talk like that? He's blaspheming!
Who can forgive sins but God alone?"
At the critical moment when His life was at stake, the high priest put the question to Him directly: "Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?"
"I am," said Jesus. "And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven."
The high priest tore his clothes. "Why do we need any more witnesses?" he asked. "You have heard the blasphemy" (Mark 14:61-64).
So close was His connection with God that He equated a person's attitude to Himself with the person's attitude toward God. Thus, to know Him was to know God (John 8:19; 14:7). To see Him was to see God (12:45; 14:9). To believe in Him was to believe in God (12:44; 14:1).
To receive Him was to receive God (Mark 9:37).
To hate Him was to hate God (John 15:23). And to honor Him was to honor God (5:23).
As we face the claims of Christ, there are only four possibilities. He was either a liar, a lunatic, a legend, or the Truth.
If we say He is not the Truth, we are automatically affirming one of the other three alternatives, whether we realize it or not.
(1) One possibility is that Jesus lied when He said He was God -- that He knew He was not God, but deliberately deceived His hearers to lend authority to His teaching.
Few, if any, seriously hold this position.
Even those who deny His deity affirm that He was a great moral teacher.
They fail to realize those two statements are a contradiction. Jesus could hardly be a great moral teacher if, on the most crucial point of His teaching -- His identity -- He was a deliberate liar.
(2) A kinder, though no less shocking possibility, is that He was sincere but self-deceived. We have a name for a person today who thinks he is God.
That name is lunatic, and it certainly would apply to Christ if He were deceived on this all-important issue.
But as we look at the life of Christ, we see no evidence of the abnormality and imbalance we find in a deranged person.
Rather, we find the greatest composure under pressure.
(3) The third alternative is that all of the talk about His claiming to be God is a legend -- that what actually happened was that His enthusiastic followers, in the third and fourth centuries, put words into His mouth He would have been shocked to hear.
Were He to return, He would immediately repudiate them.
The legend theory has been significantly refuted by many discoveries of modern archeology. These have conclusively shown that the four biographies of Christ were written within the lifetime of contemporaries of Christ. Some time ago Dr. William F. Albright, world-famous archaeologist now retired from Johns Hopkins University, said that there was no reason to believe that any of the Gospels were written later than A.D. 70. For a mere legend about Christ, in the form of the Gospel, to have gained the circulation and to have had the impact it had, without one shred of basis in fact, is incredible.
For this to have happened would be as fantastic as for someone in our own time to write a biography of the late John F. Kennedy and in it say he claimed to be God, to forgive people's sins, and to have risen from the dead.
Such a story is so wild it would never get off the ground because there are still too many people around who knew Kennedy.
The legend theory does not hold water in the light of the early date of the Gospel manuscripts.
(4) The only other alternative is that Jesus spoke the truth.
From one point of view, however, claims don't mean much.
Talk is cheap.
Anyone can make claims.
There have been others who have claimed to be God.
I could claim to be God, and you could claim to be God, but the question all of us must answer is, "What credentials do we bring to substantiate our claim?" In my case it wouldn't take you five minutes to disprove my claim.
It probably wouldn't take too much more to dispose of yours. But when it comes to Jesus of Nazareth, it's not so simple.
He had the credentials to back up His claim.
He said, "Even though you do not believe Me, believe the evidence of the miracles, that you may learn and understand that the Father is in Me, and I in the Father" (John 10:38).
First, His moral character coincided with His claims. Many asylum inmates claim to be celebrities or deities.
But their claims are belied by their characters.
Not so with Christ. He is unique -- as unique as God.
Jesus Christ was sinless. The caliber of His life was such that He was able to challenge His enemies with the question, "Can any of you prove Me guilty of sin?" (John 8:46).
He was met by silence, even though He addressed those who would have liked to point out a flaw in His character.
We read of the temptations of Jesus, but we never hear of a confession of sin on His part.
He never asked for forgiveness, though He told His followers to do so.
This lack of any sense of moral failure on Jesus' part is astonishing in view of the fact that it is completely contrary to the experience of the saints and mystics in all ages.
The closer men and women draw to God, the more overwhelmed they are with their own failure, corruption, and shortcomings.
The closer one is to a shining light, the more he realizes his need of a bath. This is true also, in the moral realm, for ordinary mortals.
It is also striking that John, Paul, and Peter, all of whom were trained from earliest childhood to believe in the universality of sin, all spoke of the sinlessness of Christ: "He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in His mouth" (1 Peter 2:22).
Pilate, no friend of Jesus, said, "What evil has He done?" He implicitly recognized Christ's innocence.
And the Roman centurion who witnessed the death of Christ said, "Surely He was the Son of God" (Matthew. 27:54).
Second, Christ demonstrated a power over natural forces which could belong only to God, the Author of these forces.
He stilled a raging storm of wind and waves on the Sea of Galilee. In doing this He provoked from those in the boat the awestruck question, "Who is this? Even the wind and waves obey Him!" (Mark 4:41) He turned water into wine, fed 5,000 people from five loaves and two fish, gave a grieving widow back her only son by raising him from the dead, and brought to life the dead daughter of a shattered father.
To an old friend He said, "Lazarus, come forth!" and dramatically raised him from the dead.
It is most significant that His enemies did not deny this miracle.
Rather, they tried to kill Him. "If we let Him go on like this," they said, "everyone will believe in Him" (John11:48).
Third, Jesus demonstrated the Creator's power over sickness and disease.
He made the lame to walk, the dumb to speak, and the blind to see.
Some of His healings were of congenital problems not susceptible to psychosomatic cure.
The most outstanding was that of the blind man whose case is recorded in John 9.
Though the man couldn't answer his speculative questioners, his experience was enough to convince him.
"One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!" he declared.
He was astounded that his friends didn't recognize this Healer as the Son of God.
"Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind," he said (John 9:25, 32).
To him the evidence was obvious.
Fourth, Jesus' supreme credential to authenticate His claim to deity was His resurrection from the dead.
Five times in the course of His life He predicted He would die.
He also predicted how He would die and that three days later He would rise from the dead and appear to His disciples.
Surely this was the great test. It was a claim that was easy to verify.
It either happened or it didn't.
Both friends and enemies of the Christian faith have recognized the resurrection of Christ to be the foundation stone of the faith. Paul, the great apostle, wrote, "If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith" (1 Corinthians 15:14).
Paul rested his whole case on the bodily resurrection of Christ.
Either He did or He didn't rise from the dead.
If He did, it was the most sensational event in all of history.
If Christ rose, we know with certainty that God exists, what He is like, and how we may know Him in personal experience.
The universe takes on meaning and purpose, and it is possible to experience the living God in contemporary life.
On the other hand, if Christ did not rise from the dead, Christianity is an interesting museum piece -- nothing more.
It has no objective validity or reality.
Though it is a nice wishful thought, it certainly isn't worth getting steamed up about.
The martyrs who went singing to the lions, and contemporary missionaries who have given their lives in Ecuador and Congo while taking this message to others, have been poor deluded fools.
The attack on Christianity by its enemies has most often concentrated on the Resurrection because it has been clearly seen that this event is the crux of the matter. A remarkable attack was the one contemplated in the early '30s by a young British lawyer.
He was convinced that the Resurrection was mere fable and fantasy.
Sensing that it was the foundation stone of the Christian faith, he decided to do the world a favor by once and for all exposing this fraud and superstition.
As a lawyer, he felt he had the critical faculties to rigidly sift evidence and to admit nothing as evidence which did not meet the stiff criteria for admission into a law court today.
However, while Frank Morrison was doing his research, a remarkable thing happened.
The case was not nearly as easy as he had supposed.
As a result, the first chapter in his book, Who Moved the Stone? is entitled, "The Book That Refused to Be Written."
In it he described how, as he examined the evidence, he became persuaded against his will, of the fact of the bodily resurrection of Christ.
Jesus' death was by public execution on a cross.
The government said it was for blasphemy.
Jesus said it was to pay for our sin.
After being severely tortured, Jesus' wrists and feet were nailed to a cross where He hung, eventually dying of slow suffocation. A sword was thrust into His side to confirm His death.
The body of Jesus was then wrapped in linens covered with approximately 100 pounds of gummy-wet spices. His body was placed in a solid rock tomb A 1 1/2- 2 ton boulder was rolled by levers to secure the entrance. Because Jesus had publicly said He would rise from the dead in three days, a guard of trained Roman soldiers was stationed at the tomb.
And an official Roman seal was affixed to the tomb entrance declaring it government property.
In spite of all this, three days later the body was gone.
Only the grave linens remained, in the form of the body, but caved in.
The boulder formerly sealing the tomb was found up a slope, some distance away from the tomb.
The earliest explanation circulated was that the disciples stole the body!
In Matthew 28:11-15, we have the record of the reaction of the chief priests and the elders when the guards gave them the infuriating and mysterious news that the body was gone.
They gave the soldiers money and told them to explain that the disciples had come at night and stolen the body while they were asleep.
That story was so false that Matthew didn't even bother to refute it!
What judge would listen to you if you said that while you were asleep you knew it was your neighbor who came into your house and stole your television set? Who knows what goes on while he's asleep?
Testimony like this would be laughed out of any court.
Furthermore, we are faced with a psychological and ethical impossibility.
Stealing the body of Christ is something totally foreign to the character of the disciples and all that we know of them. It would mean that they were perpetrators of a deliberate lie which was responsible for the deception and ultimate death of thousands of people.
It is inconceivable that, even if a few of the disciples had conspired and pulled off this theft, they would never have told the others.
Each of the disciples faced the test of torture and martyrdom for his statements and beliefs.
Men and women will die for what they believe to be true, though it may actually be false.
They do not, however, die for what they know is a lie.
If ever a man tells the truth, it is on his deathbed.
And if the disciples had taken the body, and Christ was still dead, we would still have the problem of explaining His alleged appearances.
A second hypothesis is that the authorities, Jewish or Roman, moved the body! But why? Having put guards at the tomb, what would be their reason for moving the body?
Also, what about the silence of the authorities in the face of the apostles' bold preaching about the Resurrection in Jerusalem?
The ecclesiastical leaders were seething with rage, and did everything possible to prevent the spread of this message that Jesus rose from the dead.
They arrested Peter and John and beat and threatened them, in an attempt to close their mouths.
But there was a very simple solution to their problem.
If they had Christ's body, they could have paraded it through the streets of Jerusalem.
In one fell swoop they would have successfully smothered Christianity in its cradle. That they did not do this bears eloquent testimony to the fact that they did not have the body.
Another popular theory has been that the women, distraught and overcome by grief, missed their way in the dimness of the morning and went to the wrong tomb.
In their distress they imagined Christ had risen because the tomb was empty.
This theory, however, falls before the same fact that destroys the previous one.
If the women went to the wrong tomb, why did the high priests and other enemies of the faith not go to the right tomb and produce the body?
Further, it is inconceivable that Peter and John would succumb to the same mistake, and certainly Joseph of Arimathea, owner of the tomb, would have solved the problem.
In addition, it must be remembered that this was a private burial ground, not a public cemetery.
There was no other tomb nearby that would have allowed them to make this mistake.
The swoon theory has also been advanced to explain the empty tomb.
In this view, Christ did not actually die.
He was mistakenly reported to be dead, but had swooned from exhaustion, pain, and loss of blood. When He was laid in the coolness of the tomb, He revived. He came out of the tomb and appeared to His disciples, who mistakenly thought He had risen from the dead.
This is a theory of modern construction.
It first appeared at the end of the eighteenth century. It is significant that not a suggestion of this kind has come down from antiquity among all the violent attacks which have been made on Christianity.
All of the earliest records are emphatic about Jesus' death.
But let us assume for a moment that Christ was buried alive and swooned.
Is it possible to believe that He would have survived three days in a damp tomb without food or water or attention of any kind?
Would He have had the strength to extricate Himself from the graveclothes, push the heavy stone away from the mouth of the grave, overcome the Roman guards, and walk miles on feet that had been pierced with spikes?
Such a belief is more fantastic than the simple fact of the Resurrection itself.
Even the German critic David Strauss, who by no means believes in the Resurrection, rejected this idea as incredible.
He said:
It is impossible that One who had just come forth from the grave half dead, who crept about weak and ill, who stood in the need of medical treatment, of bandaging, strengthening, and tender care, and who at last succumbed to suffering, could ever have given the disciples the impression that He was a conqueror over death and the grave; that He was the Prince of Life.
Finally, if this theory is correct, Christ Himself was involved in flagrant lies.
His disciples believed and preached that He was dead but came alive again.
Jesus did nothing to dispel this belief, but rather encouraged it.
The only theory that adequately explains the empty tomb is the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.
If Jesus Christ rose from the dead, proving He is God, He is alive today.
He is willing to be more than worshiped.
He is willing to be known and to come into our lives.
Jesus said, "Behold, I stand at the door [of your heart] and knock; if anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come into him" (Revelation 3:20).
The late Carl Gustav Jung said, "The central neurosis of our time is emptiness."
All of us have a deep longing for our life to have meaning and depth. Jesus offers us a more meaningful, abundant life, which comes through a relationship with Him. Jesus said, "I came that they might have life, and have it abundantly" (John 10:10).
Because Jesus died on the cross, taking with Him all of humankind's sin, He now offers us forgiveness, acceptance and a genuine relationship with Him.
Right now you can invite Jesus Christ into your life. You could say to Him something like, "Jesus, thank You for dying on the cross for my sins.
I ask You to forgive me and to come into my life right now. Thank You for giving me a relationship with You."
I am praying that 2009 will be the Year of the Lord for you, dear sister!
Post a Comment